Bilateral versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Dialysis Patients with Multivessel Disease


  • Takeshi Kinoshita
  • Tohru Asai
  • Yoshitaka Murakami
  • Osamu Nishimura
  • Norihiko Hiramatsu
  • Tomoaki Suzuki
  • Atsushi Kambara
  • Keiji Matsubayashi



Background: The purpose of our study was to compare mortality in dialysis patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) or single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting and to quantify the magnitude of the BITA grafting benefit for survival.

Methods: Between January 2002 and December 2008, 656 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (99.1% by an off-pump technique). Fifty-six of these patients with chronic dialysis and multivessel disease were retrospectively compared with respect to surgical technique: BITA (n = 32) or SITA (n = 23) grafting. End points were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (mean follow-up duration, 2.5 years). In an attempt to minimize the selection bias, we created propensity scores based on 13 preoperative factors that would affect the surgeon's decision about operative strategy; these factors were used for regression adjustment (C statistic, 0.914).

Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, prevalence of diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease, and logistic EuroSCORE. All patients under-went revascularization with the off-pump technique, with no conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. All arterial conduits were harvested with a skeletonization technique in all cases. Except for 1 patient who received a SITA, internal thoracic arteries were used as in situ grafts in both groups. Complete revascularization was achieved in all patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates free from all-cause mortality for BITA grafting versus SITA grafting were 94% versus 73%, 72% versus 42%, and 52% versus 28%, respectively (P = .01, logrank test). For survival free from cardiovascular mortality, the respective rates were 100% versus 90%, 80% versus 77%, and 80% versus 58% (P = .06). After propensity score adjustment, BITA grafting was significantly associated with lower risks for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.81; P = .02) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.93; P = .04).

Conclusion: In situ skeletonized BITA grafting provides better long-term survival in dialysis patients with multivessel disease.


Asai T, Tabata S. 2002. Skeletonization of the right gastroepiploic artery using an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 74:1715-7.nAsai T. 2006. Technique and results for skeletonized GEA using the Harmonic Scalpel in combination with other arterial grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. In: He G-W, ed. Arterial grafting for coronary artery bypass surgery. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 196-200.nBeckermann J, Van Camp J, Li S, Wahl SK, Collins A, Herzog CA. 2006. On-pump versus off-pump coronary surgery outcomes in patients requiring dialysis: perspectives from a single center and the United States experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:1261-6.nBerreklouw E, Rademakers PPC, Koster JM, van Leur L, van der Wielen BJ, Westers P. 2001. Better ischemic event-free survival after two internal thoracic artery grafts: 13 years of follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1535-41.nBlakeman BP, Sullivan HJ, Foy BK, Sobotka PA, Pifarre R. 1990. Internal mammary artery revascularization in the patient on long-term renal dialysis. Ann Thorac Surg 50:776-8.nDacey LJ, Lui JY, Braxton JH, et al. 2002. Long-term survival of dialysis patients after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 74:458-63.nDe Paulis R, de Notaris S, Scaffa R, et al. 2005. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: the role of skeletonization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:536-43.nDewey TM, Herbert MA, Prince SL, et al. 2006. Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve survival among patients with end-stage renal disease? Ann Thorac Surg 81:591-8.nEndo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. 2001. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 104:2164-70.nFranga DL, Kratz JM, Crumbley AJ, Zellner JL, Stroud MR, Crawford FA. 2000. Early and long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting in dialysis patients. Ann Thorac Surg 70:813-9.nHigami T, Kozawa S, Asada T, Shida T, Ogawa K. 2000. Skeletonization and harvest of the internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 70:307-8.nHigami T, Yamashita T, Nohara H, Iwahashi K, Shiga T, Ogawa K. 2001. Early results of coronary grafting using ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1224-8.nKai M, Okabayashi H, Hanyu M, et al. 2007. Long-term results of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in dialysis patients. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1666-71.nKramer A, Mastsa A, Paz Y, et al. 2000. Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in 303 patients seventy years and older. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:290-7.nLegare JF, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA, Hirsch GM. 2004. Composite arterial grafts versus conventional grafting for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:160-6.nLytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FP, Cosgrove DM. 2004. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2005-14.nMatsa M, Paz Y, Gurevitch J, et al. 2001. Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts in patients with diabetes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:668-74.nNakano J, Okabayashi H, Hanyu M, et al. 2008. Risk factors for wound infection after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: should bilateral internal thoracic arteries be harvested in patients with diabetes? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:540-5.nPeterson MD, Borger MA, Rao V, Peniston CM, Feindel CM. 2003. Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:1314-9.nPick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. 1997. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 64:599-605.nSchmidt SE, Jones JW, Thornby JI, Miller CC, Beall SC Jr. 1997. Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 64:9-15.nTaggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. 2001. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 358:870-5.nTector AJ, McDonald ML, Kress DC, Downey FX, Schmahl TM. 2001. Purely internal thoracic artery grafts: outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 72:450-5.nUra M, Sakata R, Nakayama Y, Arai Y, Kitaoka M, Fukui H. 2001. The impact of chronic renal failure on atherosclerosis of the internal thoracic arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 71:148-51.n



How to Cite

Kinoshita, T., Asai, T., Murakami, Y., Nishimura, O., Hiramatsu, N., Suzuki, T., Kambara, A., & Matsubayashi, K. (2010). Bilateral versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Dialysis Patients with Multivessel Disease. The Heart Surgery Forum, 13(5), E280-E286.