Can Moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch Be Tolerated in a Selected Group of Patients with Aortic Valve Replacement?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3369

Keywords:

PPM, AVR, Patient Prosthesis, Mismatch

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and its effects on ejection fraction (EF), gradients, and late survival.

Methods: 200 patients who underwent isolated mechanical AVR between March 2013 and May 2016 were retrospectively evaluated based on patient records.

Results: 200 patients were included in the study. No PPM was detected in 42 (21%) patients, moderate PPM in 122 (61%), and severe PPM in 36 (18%) patients. A significant decrease was found in all groups in terms of mean valve gradients and LVMI (preoperative LVMI compared with postoperative LVMI at the 12th month) (P < .001). A 30% decrease in mean LVMI in the no PPM and moderate PPM groups and a 20% decrease in the severe PPM group were detected at the 6th month.

Conclusion: In our postoperative data, we found that EF was preserved, the transvalvular gradient reduced, and LVMI decreased. There was no difference in mortality rates between the control (no PPM) group and the moderate PPM group. Taking into account our patient groups, we can say that no-to-moderate PPM has no major effect on left ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved left ventricular functions.

References

Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, et al. 2007. Impact of patient–prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:790-6.

Bilkhu R, Jahangiri M, Otto CM. 2019. Patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement. Heart 105(Suppl2):s28-s33.

Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, et al. 2003. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:783-96.

Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. 2003. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108:983-8.

Das De SD, Nanjappa A, Morcos K, et al. 2019. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival after aortic and mitral valve replacement: a 10 year, single institution experience. J Cardiothorac Surg 14:214.

Garcia Fuster R, Montero Arguto JA, Gil Albarova O, et al. 2003. Left ventricular mass index in aortic valve surgery: a new index for early valve replacement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:696-702.

Guo L, Zheng J, Chen L, et al. 2017. Impact of prosthesis patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China. J Cardiothorac Surg 12:42.

Haunschild J, Scharnowski S, Mende M, et al. 2019. Aortic root enlargement to mitigate patient-prosthesis mismatch: do early adverse events justify reluctance? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg pii:ezz016.

Hawkins RB, Beller JP, Mehaffey JH, et al. 2019. Incremental risk of annular enlargement: a multi-institutional cohort study. Ann Thorac Surg 108:1752-9.

Hoffmann G, Abraham-Westphal S, Attmann T, et al. 2018. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on long-term survival and quality of life. Thorac Cardiovascular Surg.

Kim H, Lee S, Joo H, et al. 2020 Impact of suture techniques for aortic valve replacement on prosthesis-patient mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 109:661-7.

Kitamura T, Torii S, Hanayama N, et al. 2013. Moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch may be negligible in elderly patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Int Heart J 54:11-14.

Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. 1987. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 59:956-60.

Maheshwari A, Gupta R, Saha D, Naqvi SEH, Minhas HS, Geelani MA. 2020. Konno procedure for managing small aortic root during aortic valve replacement surgery: an experience of 12 cases. World Journal Cardiovasc Surg 10:24.

Mascherbauer J, Rosenhek R, Fuchs C, et al. 2008. Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short- and long term mortality. Heart 94:1639-45.

Monin J-L, Monchi M, Kirsch ME, et al. 2007. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival. Eur Heart J 28:2620-6.

Nozohoor S, Nilsson J, Luhrs C, Roijer A, Sjogren J. 2007. The influence of patientprosthesis mismatch on in-hospital complications and early mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 16:475-82.

Okamura H, Hori D, Kusadokoro S, et al. 2020. Long-term outcomes and echocardiographic data after aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm mechanical valve. Circ J CJ-20.

Otto ME, Atik F, Moreira M, et al. 2020. Determinants of aortic prosthesis mismatch in a Brazilian Public Health System hospital: Big patients or small prosthesis? Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 114:12-22.

Rabus MB, Kirali K, Kayalar N, et al. 2009. Effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch on postoperative early mortality in isolated aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 18:18-27.

Sá MPBDO, de Carvalho MMB, Sobral Filho DC, et al. 2019. Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient–prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of 108,182 patients. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 56:44-54.

Sá MPBO, Carvalho MMB, Filho DCS, et al. 2019. Impact of surgical aortic root enlargement on the outcomes of aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of 13,174 patients. Interactive Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 29:74-82.

Sakamoto Y, Yoshitake M, Naganuma H, Kawada N, Kinouchi K, Hashimoto K. 2010. Reconsideration of patient-prosthesis mismatch definition from the valve indexed effective orifice area. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1951-5.

Swinkels BM, Bas A, Kelder JC, Vermeulen FE, Jurriën M. 2016. Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: effect on long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1388-94.

Vipparth SC, Ravi V, Avula S, et al. 2020. Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with low surgical risk. Am J Cardiol 125:459-68.

Vriesendorp MD, de Lind van Wijngaarden R, Klautz R. 2020. Concomitant aortic root enlargement is perhaps safe, but is it also effective? Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 57:815.

Zhang HW, Gu J, Xiao ZH, et al. 2019. Global longitudinal strain in prosthesis-patient mismatch: relation to left ventricular mass regression and outcomes. J Cardiovasc Med 20: 434-41.

Published

2021-02-15

How to Cite

Kaya, İbrahim C., Ozgur, M. M., Hancer, H., Ozer, T. ., Altas Yerlikhan, O., & Sunar, H. (2021). Can Moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch Be Tolerated in a Selected Group of Patients with Aortic Valve Replacement?. The Heart Surgery Forum, 24(1), E130-E136. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.3369

Issue

Section

Articles