The Effect of Coronary Revascularization on New-Onset Complete Atrioventricular Block Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081107Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease is one of the most common causes of complete atrioventricular block (AVB) in adults. In this study, we evaluated whether prompt revascularization of the coronary artery occlusion can ameliorate new-onset complete AVB due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methods: Five patients (4 men and 1 woman) with a mean age of 69.8 ± 7.1 years with diagnosed new-onset complete AVB and proven coronary artery disease were enrolled in the study. At the time of AVB diagnosis, 3 of the patients had acute myocardial infarction, and the other 2 patients had unstable angina pectoris. All patients underwent complete coronary bypass surgery after the diagnosis of complete AVB. A patient who underwent 2 coronary bypasses also underwent aortic valve replacement.
Results: No mortality was observed in the study group. All but one of the patients converted back to sinus rhythm after a mean interval of 30 ± 13.6 hours following revascularization procedures. Complete AVB persisted in 1 patient, and a permanent pacemaker was implanted. All patients were discharged uneventfully. The mean hospital stay was 11.4 ± 4.5 days. All patients are still being followed up after surgery; at a mean follow-up of 27.4 ± 0.9 months, there have been no further problems.
Conclusion: Coronary revascularization may ameliorate ACS-related new-onset complete AVB with an acceptable rate of successful reversion to sinus rhythm. An especially appropriate time for surgery, complete coronary revascularization, and management of myocardial protection during surgery might improve the results of coronary bypass procedures in these patients.
References
Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, Wilkinson P, Ranjadayalan K, Timmis AD. 1998. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J 19:893-8.nCeviz M, Koçak H, Ba?o?lu A, et al. 1995. Post-CABG conduction disturbances. Ann Thorac Surg 59:546-7.nCook DJ, Bailon JM, Douglas TT, et al. 2005. Changing incidence, type, and natural history of conduction defects after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1732-7.nEagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. 2004. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 110:1168-76.nEscosteguy CC, Carvalho MA, Medronho RA, Abreau LM, Monteiro Filho MY. 2001. Bundle branch and atrioventricular block as complications of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Arq Bras Cardiol 76:291-6.nFlack JE 3rd, Hafer J, Engelman RM, Rousou JA, Deaton DW, Pekow P. 1992. Effect of normothermic blood cardioplegia on postoperative conduction abnormalities and supraventricular arrhythmias. Circulation 86(suppl):II385-92.nHarpaz D, Behar S, Gottlieb S, Boyko V, Kishon Y, Eldar., for the SPRINT Study Group and the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group. 1999. Complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1721-8.nHippeläinen M, Mustonen P, Manninen H, Rehnberg S. 1994. Predictors of conduction disturbances after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 57:1284-7.nKimura K, Kosuge M, Ishikawa T, et al. 1999. Comparison of results of early reperfusion in patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with and without complete atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol 84:731-3.nLim CH, Toh CC, Low LP. 1971. Atrioventricular and associated intraventricular conduction disturbances in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 33:947-54.nMeine TJ, Al-Khatib SM, Alexander JH, et al. 2005. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am Heart J 149:670-4.nMoreyra AE, Horvitz L, Presant SB, Kostis JB. 1988. Resolution of complete heart block after right coronary artery angioplasty Am Heart J 115:179-81.nMosseri M, Izak T, Rosenheck S, et al. 1997. Coronary angiographic characteristics of patients with permanent artificial pacemakers. Circulation 96:809-15.nMustonen P, Hippeläinen M, Vanninen E, Rehnberg S, Tenhhunen-Eskelinen, Hartikainen J. 1998. Significance of coronary artery bypass grafting-associated conduction defects. Am J Cardiol 81:558-63.nMustonen P, Pöyhönen M, Rehnberg S, et al. 2000. Conduction defects after coronary artery bypass grafting—a disappearing problem? Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:33-9.nNicod P, Gilpin E, Dittrich H, et al. 1998. Long-term outcome in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and complete atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:589-94.nOkmen E, Gurol T, Erdinler I, Sanli A, Cam N. 2003. New-onset conduction defects and their relationship with in-hospital major cardiac events in unstable angina pectoris. Coron Artery Dis 14:521-5.nOmeroglu SN, Ardal H, Erdogan HB, et al. 2005. Can revascularization restore sinus rhythm in patients with acute onset atrioventricular block? J Card Surg 20:136-41.nOpolski G, Kraska T, Ostrzycki A, Zieli?ski T, Korewicki J. 1986. The effect of infarct size on atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disturbances in acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 10:141-7.nPartington MT, Acar C, Buckberg GD, Julia PL. 1989. Studies of retrograde cardioplegia. II. Advantages of antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia to optimize distribution in jeopardized myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 97:613-22.nRamamurthy S, Anandaraja S, Matthew N. 2007. Percutaneous coronary intervention for persistent complete heart block complicating inferior myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol 19:E372-4.nRathore SS, Gersh BJ, Berger PB, et al. 2001. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart block in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Am Heart J 141:47-54.n
