Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Caution in Percutaneous Occluder Device Deployment

Authors

  • Salah Eldien Altarabsheh
  • Salil V. Deo
  • Charanjit S. Rihal
  • Soon J. Park

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20121075

Abstract

A frail 70-year-old woman presented with symptomatic mitral paravalvular leak 2 months after undergoing a double valve replacement for mixed mitral and aortic valve disease. There was no evidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Percutaneous closure of the paravalvular leak was attempted as an alternative to a high-risk surgical procedure. This therapy was successful in reducing the regurgitation but resulted in severe intravascular hemolysis and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis.

The development of new hemolysis and acute renal failure directed our attention to the Amplatzer device as a possible etiology for these complications. The assumption that her kidney injury was recent and likely reversible compelled us to think of the surgical method as a definitive option. A re-operative surgery was performed, which included retrieval of the occluder devices, pericardial patch repair, and re-replacement using a new biological prosthesis. The patient's urine output gradually improved, and the patient was dismissed with normal renal function.

We present this case as an unusual complication of percutaneous device closure. It also highlights the reversible nature of acute renal failure due to intravascular hemolysis and demonstrates the importance of early surgical intervention for this condition.

References

Chow KM, Lai FM, Wang AY, Chan YL, Tang NL, Li PK. 2001. Reversible renal failure in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Am J Kidney Dis 37:E17.nConcepcion B, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM. 2008. Intravascular hemolysis and acute renal failure after mitral and aortic valve repair. Am J Kidney Dis 52:1010-5.nGenoni M, Franzen D, Vogt P, et al. 2000. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:14-9.nJindani A, Neville EM, Venn G, Williams BT. 1991. Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 32:503-8.nKirali K, Mansuroglu D, Yaymaci B, et al. 2001. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: is left atrial enlargement an additional indication for reoperation? J Heart Valve Dis 10:418-25.nMecozzi G, Milano AD, De Carlo M, et al. 2002. Intravascular hemolysis in patients with new-generation prosthetic heart valves: a prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:550-6.nSorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. 2011. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30-day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:314-21.nWebb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. 2005. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65:69-72.n

Published

2013-02-25

How to Cite

Altarabsheh, S. E., Deo, S. V., Rihal, C. S., & Park, S. J. (2013). Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Caution in Percutaneous Occluder Device Deployment. The Heart Surgery Forum, 16(1), E21-E23. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20121075

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)