The World Wide Web and Robotic Heart Surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1196Abstract
Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to (1) determine patients' access to and use of the Internet for health-related information before and after endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass (Endo-ACAB) surgery, (2) investigate patients' methods of searching for such information, and (3) suggest future improvements for Internet-based patient education. The secondary goal of this study was to determine (1) patients' health-related quality of life and (2) degree of satisfaction following the Endo-ACAB procedure.
Methods: A follow-up study was conducted of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone Endo-ACAB procedures at the Center for Less Invasive Cardiac Surgery and Robotic Heart Surgery in Buffalo, New York. Study surveys were designed cooperatively by a communication scientist specializing in Internet studies and cardiac surgeons. Patients completed surveys over a period of 18 months, from January 2001 to June 2002.
Results: All 50 patients (100%) in the targeted study group completed the survey. Forty-four (88%) of these respondents reported having Internet access. The Web was cited as the most popular source of initial information on Endo-ACAB, with 36% of patients (18) first learning about the procedure through an Internet search. All 44 patients with Internet access used the Web as an additional source of information before surgery, but only 20% (7/35) did so after surgery. Most patients (91%, 40/44) felt that their surgeon should develop a Web site to detail the Endo-ACAB procedure. An investigation of patient quality of life showed that 96% of patients were not experiencing any symptoms related to their surgery. All 50 patients reported high degrees of satisfaction with the Endo-ACAB procedure, and 98% (49) said that they would recommend the surgery to someone else.
Conclusion: A vast majority of patients are realizing the benefits of the Internet as a tool to educate themselves, both before and after surgery. The request by an overwhelming majority of patients that surgeons develop Web sites, however, shows that patients may not be completely satisfied with the current form or content of health sites on the Internet. Surgeons will see the benefits of Web-based education only when they ensure that their patients have access to adequate and credible health-related information. The early results of robotic surgery suggest a promising future and the need to investigate the role of the Internet in its growth.
References
Computer Motion. 2002. A surgical evolution: the Endo ACAB™ pro gram. Available at: http://www.computermotion.com/endo-acab/index. html. Accessed July 10, 2002.nCzibik G, D'Ancona G, Donias HW, Karamanoukian HL. 2002. Robotic cardiac surgery: present and future applications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:495-501.nD'Ancona G, Murero M, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian H. 2001. Is the Internet a useful tool to educate cardiac surgery patients? Heart Surg Forum 5:e13-4. Available at: http://www.hsforum.com/vol5/issue2/2001-4444.html. Accessed July 22, 2003.nDelamothe T. 2000. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. BMJ 321:843-4.nDuhaylongsod FG. 2000. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery defined. Arch Surg 135:296-301.nEysenbach G, Köhler C. 2002. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 324:573-7.nFerguson T. 2000. Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care. BMJ 321:1129-32.nFerguson T. 2002. From patients to end users. BMJ 324:555-6.nHeartCenterOnline. 2002. Minimally invasive bypass surgery. Available at: http://www.heartcenteronline.com/myheartdr/common. Accessed July 24, 2002.nKiley R. 1999. Internet statistics. Health Information on the Internet 10:e1-2. Available at http://www.rsm.uk/hii/issue10.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2003.nMurero M, D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H. 2001. Use of the Internet by patients before and after cardiac surgery: telephone survey. J Med Internet Res 3:e27. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2001/3/e27. Accessed July 22, 2003.nNua. 2002. How many online? Available at: http://www.nua.org/surveys/how_many_online. Accessed July 17, 2002.nPew Research Center. 2002. Vital decisions: how Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick [Pew Internet & American Life Web site]. Available at: http://www.pewinter-net.org/reports/toc.asp?Report = 59. Accessed July 22, 2003.nPowell J, Clarke A. 2002. The WWW of the World Wide Web: who, what, and why? J Med Internet Res 4:e4. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2002/1/e4. Accessed July 22, 2003.nPurcell G, Wilson P, Delamothe T. 2002. The quality of health information on the internet: as for any other medium it varies widely; regulation is not the answer. BMJ 324:557-8.nTang WT, D'Ancona G, Bergsland J, Kawaguchi A, Karamanoukian HL. 2001. Robotically assisted video-enhanced-endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Angiology 52:99-102.nWilson P. 2002. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the Internet. BMJ 324:598-600.nStamou SC, Dangas G, Hill PC, et al. 2000. Atrial fibrillation after beating heart surgery. Am J Cardiol 86:64-7.nSemere W, Karamanoukian HL, Levitt M, et al. 2003. A pediatric surgery study: parent usage of the Internet for medical information. J Pediatr Surg 38:560-4.nSigouin C, Jadad AR. 2002. Awareness of sources of peer-reviewed research evidence on the Internet. JAMA 287:2867-9.nSim EKW, Grignani RT, Cheng A, Lim TT, Lim YT, Saw HS. 2000. Hybrid cardiac revascularisation surgery. Singapore Med J 41:36-8.n
