Experience on the Way to Totally Endoscopic Atrial Septal Defect Repair

Authors

  • Nikolaos Bonaros
  • Thomas Schachner
  • Armin Oehlinger
  • Patrycja Jonetzko
  • Silvana Mueller
  • Nico Moes
  • Christian Kolbitsch
  • Peter Mair
  • Guenther Putz
  • Guenther Laufer
  • Johannes Bonatti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041098

Abstract

Background: Remote-access perfusion and robotics have enabled totally endoscopic closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO). We report on a stepwise approach to a totally endoscopic procedure.

Methods: Seventeen patients (median age, 39 years; range, 21-55 years) underwent limited-access ASD or PFO closure. As a preparative step, the operation was carried out through minithoracotomy in 11 patients. In parallel, experience with robotic surgery was gained with totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. After performance of ASD closures in dry-laboratory models using the da Vinci telemanipulation system, 6 patients were operated on in a totally endoscopic fashion.

Results: With the endoscopic approach, significant learning curves were noted for cardiopulmonary bypass time y(min) = 226 - 41 * ln(x) (P = .03) and aortic cross-clamp time y(min) = 134 - 42 * ln(x) (P = .01) (x = number of procedures). There was no hospital mortality, and no residual shunts were detected at postoperative echocardiography. Median ventilation time was 9 hours (range, 0-18 hours) for the minithoracotomy group and 6 hours (range, 4-19 hours) for the totally endoscopic group. Median intensive care unit stay was 20 hours (range, 18-24 hours) and 18 hours (range, 18120 hours), respectively.

Conclusions: The implementation of robotic totally endoscopic closure of ASD or PFO in a heart surgery program seems to be safe. An intermediate step of performing the operations through minithoracotomy, adapting to remote access perfusion systems, and gaining experience in other robotic cardiac surgical procedures seems worthwhile. Learning curves are apparent, and adequate defect closure does not seem to be compromised by the totally endoscopic approach.

References

Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T, et al. 2003. Totally endoscopicatrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 108(suppl II):II-191-4.nBichell DP, Geva T, Bacha EA, Mayer JE, Jonas RA, del Nido PJ. 2000. Minimal access approach for the repair of atrial septal defect: the initial 135 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 70:115-8.nBoehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, et al. 2000. Clinical use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:198-202.nBonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, et al. 2004. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:504-10.nCarpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupécle B, et al. 1998. Computer-assisted open heart surgery: first case operated on with success. C R Acad Sci III 321:437-42.nWimmer-Greinecker G, Dogan S, Aybek T, et al. 2003. Totally endoscopic atrial septal repair in adults with computer-enhanced telemanipulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:465-8.nChitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, et al. 2001. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 234:475-84.nDeRose JJ, Ashton RC, Belsley S, et al. 2003. Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1414-9.nDogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, et al. 2002. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:1125-31.nDoll N, Walther T, Falk V, Binner C, et al. 2003. Secundum ASD closure using a right lateral minithoracotomy: five-year experience in 122 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1527-31.nHijazi ZM, Cao Q, Patel H, Rhodes J. 1999. Transcatheter closure of atrial communications using the Amplatzer( septal occluder. J Intervent Cardiol 12:51-8.nHorvath KA, Burke RP, Collins JJ Jr, Cohn LH. 1992. Surgical treatment of adult atrial septal defect: early and long-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1156-9.nKing TD, Mills NL. 1976. Secundum atrial septal defects: nonoperative closure during cardiac catheterization. JAMA 235:2506-9.nMurphy JG, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, et al. 1990. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect: follow-up at 27 to 32 years. N Engl J Med 323:1645-50.nNovick RJ, Stitt LW. 1999. The learning curve of an academic cardiac surgeon: use of the CUSUM method. J Card Surg 14:312-20.nRao PS, Berger F, Rey C, et al. 2000. Results of transvenous occlusion of secundum atrial septal defects with the fourth generation buttoned device: comparison with first, second and third generation devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:583-92.nRyan WH, Cheirif J, Dewey TM, Prince SL, Mack MJ. 2003. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive atrial septal defect closure. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1532-4.nToracca L, Ismeno G, Quarti A, Alfieri O. 2001. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect closure with a robotic system: experience with seven cases. Heart Surg Forum 5:125-7.n

Published

2005-01-04

How to Cite

Bonaros, N., Schachner, T., Oehlinger, A., Jonetzko, P., Mueller, S., Moes, N., Kolbitsch, C., Mair, P., Putz, G., Laufer, G., & Bonatti, J. (2005). Experience on the Way to Totally Endoscopic Atrial Septal Defect Repair. The Heart Surgery Forum, 7(5), E440-E445. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041098

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>