Less Invasive Radial Artery Harvesting: Two Years' Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20051147Abstract
Background. For coronary surgery we often use the radial artery (RA) instead of the saphenous vein, trying to exploit the advantages offered by this conduit. To eliminate the problems regarding alteration of upper-extremity function after RA procurement related to the standard conventional harvesting technique, we started using the less invasive harvesting technique with surprisingly good preliminary results. To compare the outcomes of open versus less invasive harvesting procedures, a prospective, nonrandomized study was developed by 2 centers.
Methods. From January 2001 to March 2003, there were 87 consecutive patients in the less invasive radial artery harvesting (LIRAH) group and 90 patients in the conventional radial artery harvesting (CRAH) group. Patient characteristics and demographics were similar in the groups. Data collection was made to evaluate possible benefits of the LIRAH technique in terms of fewer forearm and hand complications, better aesthetics, and improved patient satisfaction.
Results
Between January 11, 2001, and March 30, 2003, 177 patients underwent either primary or redo coronary artery revascularizations with procurement of the RA for use as a conduit with the less invasive harvesting technique. The mean follow-up was 2 months. Four patients died, and overall mortality was 2.26%. One hundred seventy-three patients were successfully examined during the first postoperative control, 85 in the LIRAH group and 88 patients in the CRAH group. Objective and subjective data were collected from the consultant. The overall average age was 60.5 years (range, 40-77 years). In the LIRAH group, the mean overall incision length (when 2 incisions were necessary, both incision lengths were measured) was 5.6 cm (range, 4-10 cm), and the mean vessel length was 16 cm (range, 10-19 cm). Eighteen patients (20.6%) necessitated double incision. Mean harvesting time (from incision to skin closure) was 43.3 min (range, 25-70 min). Fourteen patients (16.4%) presented some kind of complication during the study. There were no cases with acute ischemia, bleeding, or re-exploration. Seventy-five patients (88.2%) found the cosmetic result excellent. Ten patients (11.8%) found it good, and none considered it mediocre.
In the CRAH group, the mean incision length was 20 cm (range, 18-22 cm), and the mean vessel length was 18 cm (range, 17-20 cm ). Mean harvesting time (from incision to skin closure) was 30.8 min (range, 14-45 min). Thirty-four patients (38.6%) presented some kind of complication during the study. Three patients (3.5%) found the cosmetic result excellent. Forty-three (48.8%) found it good, and 42 (47.7%) considered it mediocre.
Conclusions. A potential of fewer neurological forearm postoperative complications, better aesthetics, and improved patient satisfaction can be achieved by the LIRAH technique.
References
Reddy VS, Parikh SM, Drinkwater D, et al. 2002. Morbidity after procurement of radial arteries in diabetic patients and the elderly undergoing coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 73:803-8.nTatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Royse AG. 1999. Total arterial coronary revascularization: techniques and results in 3,220 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2093-9.nSaeed I, Anyanwu AC, Yacoub MH, et al. 2001. Subjective patient outcomes following coronary artery bypass using the radial artery: results of a cross-sectional survey of harvest site complications and quality of life. European J of Cardio-thorac Surg 20:1142-6.nOlenchock Jr SA, Reed JF, Murphy SA, et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvest as conduit for cardiac revascularization. Presented at the Fourth Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, June 27-30, 2001, Munich, Germany.nTerada Y, Uchida A, Fukuda I, et al. 1998. Endoscopic harvesting of the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass graft. Ann Thorac Surg 66(6):2123-4nTatoulis J, Royse AG, Buxton BF, et al. 2002. The radial artery in coronary surgery: a 5-year experience--clinical and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 73:143-8.nAmano A, Hirose H, Takahashi A, Nagano N. 2001. Coronary artery bypass grafting using radial artery: midterm results in a Japanese Institute. Ann Thorac Surg 72:120-5.nGenovesi MH, Torrillo L, Fonger J, et al. 2001. Endoscopic radial artery harvest: a new approach. Heart Surg Forum 3:223-5.nGlajda Z, Peterffy A. 2001. Minimally invasive harvesting of the radial artery as a coronary bypass graft. Ann Thorac Surg 72:291-3.nMassetti M, Babatasi G, Bruno PG, et al. 2002. Less invasive radial artery approach. Heart Surg Forum 5 (Suppl 4):S392-7.nMeharwal ZS, Trehan N. 2001. Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1557-61.nReyes AT, Frame R, Brodman RF. 1995. Technique for harvesting the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass graft. Ann Thorac Surg 59:118-26.nAcar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny J, et al. 1998. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: Clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:981-9.nAnyanwu AC, Saeed I, Bustami M, et al. 2001. Does routine use of the radial artery increase complexity or morbidity of coronary bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 71:555-60.nDenton TA, Trenton L, Cohen M, et al. 2001. Radial artery harvesting for coronary bypass operations: neurologic complications and their potential mechanisms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121 :951-6.n
