Aortic Valve-Sparing Operations: Early and Midterm Results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.2005-1177Abstract
Background. Aortic valve-sparing operations have provided very good clinical outcomes. However, there is still a debate about valve durability because of the absence of the Valsalva sinuses, and various techniques have been proposed to reproduce the native anatomy of the aortic root. We reviewed our total experience with aortic valve-sparing operations to determine early and midterm outcomes.
Methods. Between July 2001 and August 2004, 85 patients underwent valve-sparing operations. There were 67 (78.8%) male and 18 (21.2%) female patients with a mean age of 58.8 ± 14.6 years. Sixty-five patients with an aortic root aneurysm underwent the David I reimplantation technique, and a Gel-weave Valsalva graft was used in 57 patients. Twenty patients with an ascending aortic aneurysm underwent replacement of the ascending aorta with sinotubular junction reduction.
Results. There were 3 in-hospital deaths (3.5%) and 2 late deaths. Two of 4 patients with acute aortic dissection died. The 3-year survival for patients with an aortic root aneurysm was 95.4% ± 2.6%, and for patients with an ascending aortic aneurysm it was 89.2% ± 7.3 (P = .464). Seven patients developed 3 to 4+ aortic insufficiency, and 5 of them required aortic valve replacement. The 3-year freedom rate from grade 3 to 4 aortic insufficiency was 88.9% ± 5.2% for patients with an aortic root aneurysm and 88.2% ± 7.8% for those with an ascending aortic aneurysm. At 3 years, the freedom rates from late aortic valve replacement were 92.2% ± 4.9% in the aortic root aneurysm group and 88.2% ± 7.8% in the ascending aortic aneurysm group.
Conclusions. Aortic valve-sparing operations showed excellent results in patients electively operated on for aortic root ectasia, and the results in acute aortic dissection were very disappointing. The Gelweave Valsalva prosthesis demon-strated ease of implantability and good reproduction of the pseuodosinuses. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if this graft will enhance the function and increase the durability of the aortic valve.
References
Alsoufi B, Borger MA, Armstrong S, Maganti M, David TE. 2005. Results of valve preservation and repair for bicuspid aortic valve insufficiency. J Heart Valve Dis 14:752-9nBentall HH, De Bono A. 1968. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax 23:338-9nBethea BT, Fitton TP, Alejo DE, et al. 2004. Results of aortic valve-sparing operations: experience with remodelling and reimplantation procedures in 65 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 78:767-72nCasselman FP, Gillinov AM, Akhrass R, Kasirajan V, Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM. 1999. Intermediate-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair for prolapsing leaflet. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:302-8nCochran RP, Kunzelman KS, Eddy AC, et al. 1995. Modified conduit preparation creates a pseudosinus in an aortic valve-sparing procedure for aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:1049-58nDagum P, Green GR, Nistal FJ, et al. 1999. Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants. Circulation 100(Suppl II):54-62nDavid TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, et al. 2001. Results of aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:39-46nDavid TE, Feindel M. 1992. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103:617-22nDavid TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, et al. 2002. Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1758-61nDe Paulis R, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, et al. 2000. A new aortic Dacron conduit for surgical treatment of aortic root pathology. Ital Heart J 1:457-63nDe Paulis R, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, et al. 2002. Analysis of valve motion after reimplantation type of valve-sparing procedure (David-I) with a new aortic root conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 74:53-7nDe Paulis R, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, et al. 2001. Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after valve-sparing procedures using a new aortic root conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 72:487-94nEdwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP, et al. 2001. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:885-92nFenoglio JJ, McAllister HA, De Castro CM, et al. 1977. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve after age 20. Am J Cardiol 39:164-9nGrande KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, et al. 1998. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry. Ann Biomed Eng 26:534-45nGott VL, Cameron DE, Alejo DE, et al. 2002. Aortic root replacement in 271 Marfan patients: a 24-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 73:438-43nIkonomidis JS, Miller DC. 2002. Stentless bioprosthesis aortic valve replacement after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124:848-51nKallenbach K, Oelze T, Salcher R, et al. 2004. Evolving strategies for treatment of acute aortic dissection type A. Circulation 110(Suppl II):243-9nKamohara K, Itoh T, Natsuaki M, et al. 1999. Early valve failure after valve-sparing root reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 68:257-9nKin H, Izumoto H, Nakajima T, et al. 2003. Midterm results of conservative repair of incompetent bicuspid aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 44:19-23nKvitting JP E, Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, et al. 2004. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: Implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1602-7nLanger F, Aicher D, Kissinger A, et al. 2004. Aortic valve repair using a differentiated surgical strategy. Circulation 110(Suppl II):67-73nLeyh RG, Fischer S, Kallenbach K, et al. 2002. High failure rate after valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the "remodeling technique" in acute type A dissection. Circulation 106(Suppl I):229-33nLuciani GB, Casali G, Tomezzoli A, et al. 1999. Recurrence of aortic insufficiency after aortic root remodeling with valve preservation. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1849-52nMiller DC. 2003. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with the Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:773-8nMills P, Leech G, Davies M, et al. 1978. The natural history of a nonstenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J 40:951-7nMoidl R, Moritz A, Simon P, Kupilik N, Wolner E, Mohl W. 1995. Echocardiographic results after repair of incompetent bicuspid aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 60:669-72nNash PJ, Vitvitsky E, Li J, Cosgrove DM, Pettersson G, Grimm RA. 2005. Feasibility of valve repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve—an echocardiographic study. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1473-9nOliveira NC, David TE, Ivanov J, et al. 2003. Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:789-96nPacini D, Ranocchi F, Angeli F., et al. 2003. Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft. Ann Thorac Surg 76:90-8nRobicsek F. 1991. Leonardo da Vinci and sinuses of Valsalva. Ann Thorac Surg 52:328-35nSchäfers HJ, Fries R, Langer F, et al. 1998. Valve-preserving replacement of the ascending aorta: remodeling versus reimplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:990-6nSvensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, et al. 1992. Composite valve graft replacement of the proximal aorta: comparison of the technique in 348 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 54:427-39nYacoub MH, Fagan A, Stassano P, et al. 1983. Results of valve conserving operations for aortic regurgitation. Circulation 68:311-21nYacoub MH, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, et al. 1998. Late results of valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1080-90nZehr KJ. 2001. Reply to the Editor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:1220-1nZehr KJ, Thubrikar MJ, Gong GG, et al. 2000. Clinical introduction of a novel prosthesis for valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction for annuloaortic ectasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:692-8n
