Quality of Anastomosis in Conventional On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Influence of the Interrupted Technique Using U-Clips and Correlation with Intraoperative Graft Flow Patterns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20051157Abstract
Background. The interrupted suture technique in creating graft-coronary artery anastomoses in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is hypothesized to be superior to the standard continuous technique. However, because of the increased time and knot tying involved with the interrupted technique, the continuous suture became standard. In 2000, the U-clip (a self-closing metal clip) was introduced to help in creating an interrupted anastomosis, although data regarding its clinical use are still somewhat limited. Intraop-erative transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) of blood flow through an anastomosis is frequently used to assess quality of anastomosis creation; mean flow and pulsatile index (PI) are analyzed. PI should typically be between 1 and 5; higher values are associated with errors of anastomosis creation. The current study analyzes the difference in TTFM between U-clips and standard suture in CABG surgery.
Methods. The study population consists of 30 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing first-time on-pump conventional CABG surgery at St. Anthony Medical Center who were randomized to have their anastomosis created with either U-clips or suture. TTFM were recorded for left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery (LIMA-LAD) anastomoses.
Results. Of the 30 subjects enrolled (10 women), 12 operations were done with U-clips and 18 with suture. Body mass index (BMI) in the 2 groups was similar. In terms of mean flow, there was no difference between the 2 groups (29.8 ± 18.4 mL/min for U-clips versus 26.6 ± 11.0 mL/min for suture, P = .57). In terms of PI, again no difference was found (3.1 ± 1.3 for U-clips versus 2.5 ± 0.8 for suture, P = .12). Conclusions. The findings of this study suggest that U-clips are comparable to the standard suture for LIMA-LAD anastomoses in conventional on-pump CABG surgery in terms of intraoperative assessment of graft flow.
References
Baumgartner N, Dobrin P, Morasch M, Dong QS, Mrkvicka R. 1996. Influence of suture technique and suture material selection on the mechanics of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1063-72.nShin H, Yozu R, Mitsumaru A, et al. 2001. Intraoperative assessment of coronary artery bypass graft: transit-time flowmetry versus angiography. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1562-5.nWalpoth B, Bosshard A, Genyk I, et al. 1998. Transit-time flow measurement for detection of early graft failure during myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1097-100.nMatre K, Birkeland S, Hessevik I, Segadal L. 1994. Comparison of transit-time and Doppler ultrasound methods for measurement of flow in aortocoronary bypass grafts during cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 42:170-4.nOno M, Wolf R, Angouras D, Schneeberger EW. 2002. Early experience of coronary artery bypass grafting with a new self-closing clip device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123(4):783-7.nShemin R, Shapira O, Pawar RV, Bao U, Sayeed-Shah U, Lazar HL. 2003. U-Clip anastomoses in coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical experience. Heart Surg Forum 6(5):362-5.nD'Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Schmid S, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. 2000. Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:28793.nD'Ancona G, Salerno T. 2003. Use of nitinol-U clips and flow characteristics of LIMA-LAD anastomoses. Int Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2:237-40.nDean D, Jia C, Cabreriza SE, et al. 1996. Validation study of a new transit time ultrasonic flow probe for continuous great vessel measurements. ASAIO J 42:M671-6.nHill A, Maroney T, Virmani R, et al. 2001. Facilitated coronary anastomosis using a nitinol U-clip device: bovine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121(5):859-70.nLevin S. 2001. Cutting out the knots in surgery. Windhover's In Vivo: The Business & Medicine Report 19(3).nSchmitz C, Ashraf O, Schiller W, et al. 2003. Transit time flow measurement in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(3):645-50.nDemaria R, Fortier S, Carrier M, Perrault LP. 2003. Interrupted coalescent nitinol clip versus continuous suture coronary anastomosis: a comparative endothelial function study. Heart Surg Forum 6(2):72-6.nGerdisch M, Hinkamp T, Ainsworth SD, et al. 2003. Blood flow pattern and anastomotic compliance for interrupted versus continuous coronary bypass grafts. Heart Surg Forum 6(2):65-71.nHu S, Wang X, Song Y, Lu F. 2003. Graft patency in off-pump and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for treatment of triple vessel coronary disease. Chinese Med J 116(3):436-9.nLouagie Y, Haxhe J, Jamart J, Buche M, Schoevaerdts JC. 1994. Dopplerflow measurement in coronary artery bypass grafts and early postoperative clinical outcome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 42:175-81.nWolf R, Alderman E, Caskey MP, et al. 2003. Clinical and six-month angiographic evaluation of coronary arterial graft interrupted anastomoses by use of a self-closing clip device: a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(1):168-77.nYoung J, MacMillan J, May IA, Iverson LI, Ecker RR. 1978. Internal configuration of saphenous-coronary anastomoses as studied by the cast-injection technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 75:179-185.n
