Prediction and Perception of Technical Difficulties in Adult Cardiac Surgery
Background: Unexpected intra-operative technical difficulties are not uncommon in cardiac surgery. Our objective is to study the incidence, predictors, and consequences of unexpected difficulties in adult cardiac operations.
Methods: A total of 500 consecutive elective operations were included in the study. Before every operation, the surgeon and the assistant were asked to study the case and give a score (one to ten) for the expected technical difficulty of the operation. After every operation, the surgeon and the assistant were asked to give a score for the observed technical difficulty. The scores and perioperative data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results: In relation to different interventions and consultant/trainee predictions, unexpected technical difficulties were encountered in 7% to 16% of cases. There was a significant difference between surgeons and trainees in the perception of level of increased difficulty, represented by the mean of differences between expected and observed score (0.084 ± 0.54 versus 0.016 ± 0.5, P = .0002). In multivariable analysis, only female gender (P < .0001) was identified as a factor associated with unexpected technical difficulties. There was no correlation between the incidence of complications and unexpected surgical difficulty. However, there was a weak positive correlation between operative times and observed
Conclusion: Unexpected technical difficulties are not uncommon in adult cardiac operations. Trainees tend to underestimate the difficulties perceived by the surgeon. This study can be a first step towards developing a technical difficulty score, which could be a helpful tool for medical quality management, as well as in training programs.
Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, et al. 2016. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and the society of thoracic surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg 102:573-9.
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, et al. 2014. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745-53.
Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Kalesan B, et al. 2013. Aortic root dimensions among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:72-83.
Connors RC, Doty JR, Bull DA, et al. 2009. Effect of work-hour restriction on operative experience in cardiothoracic surgical residency training. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:710-13.
Diwadkar GB, Jelovsek JF. 2010. Measuring surgical trainee perceptions to assess the operating room educational environment. J Surg Educ 67:210-16.
Hiteshi AK, Li D, Gao Y, et al. 2014. Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin Cardiol 37:605-9.
Jones EE. 1976. How do people perceive the causes of behavior? Experiments based on attribution theory offer some insights into how actors and observers differ in viewing the causal structure of their social world. American Scientist 64:300-5.
Mokadam NA, Fann JI, Hicks GL, et al. 2017. Experience with the cardiac surgery simulation curriculum: Results of the resident and faculty survey. Ann Thorac Surg 103:322-8.
Nikitin NP, Witte KK, Thackray SD, et al. 2003. Effect of age and sex on left atrial morphology and function. Eur J Echocardiogr 4:36-42.
Odell DD, Macke RA, Tchantchaleishvili V, el al. 2015. Resident perception of technical skills education and preparation for independent practice. Ann Thorac Surg 100:2305-13.
Osborne SA, Severn P, Bunce CV, et al. 2006. The use of a pre-operative scoring system for the prediction of phacoemulsification case difficulty and the selection of appropriate cases to be performed by trainees. BMC Ophthalmol 6:38.
Pauley K, Flin R, Yule S, et al. 2011. Surgeons’ intraoperative decision making and risk management. Am J Surg 202:375-81.
Author Disclosure & Copyright Transfer Agreement
In order to publish the original work of another person(s), The Heart Surgery Forum® must receive an acknowledgment of the Author Agreement and Copyright Transfer Statement transferring to Forum Multimedia Publishing, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd. the exclusive rights to print and distribute the author(s) work in all media forms. Failure to check Copyright Transfer agreement box below will delay publication of the manuscript.
A current form follows:
The author(s) hereby transfer(s), assign(s), or otherwise convey(s) all copyright ownership of the manuscript submitted to Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC (Publisher). The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article and the material contained therein throughout the world in all languages and in all media of expression now known or later developed, including but not limited to reprints, photographic reproduction, microfilm, electronic data processing (including programming, storage, and transmission to other electronic data record(s), or any other reproductions of similar nature), and translations.
However, Publisher grants back to the author(s) the following:
- The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of this work for use of the author(s) in teaching;
- The right to use, after publication in The Heart Surgery Forum, all or part of the material from this work in a book by the author(s), or in a collection of work by the author(s);
- The royalty-free right to make copies of this work for internal distribution within the institution/company that employs the author(s) subject to the provisions below for a work-made-for-hire;
- The right to use figures and tables from this work, and up to 250 words of text, for any purpose;
- The right to make oral presentations of material from this work.
Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.
I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.
I warrant that I have no financial interest in the drugs, devices, or procedures described in the manuscript (except as disclosed in the attached statement).
I state that the institutional Human Subjects Committee and/or the Ethics Committee approved the clinical protocol reported in this manuscript for the use of experimental techniques, drugs, or devices in human subjects and appropriate informed consent documents were utilized.
Furthermore, I state that any and all animals used for experimental purposes received humane care in USDA registered facilities in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).