Echocardiography with Elevated Central Venous Pressure Diagnosing Constrictive Pericarditis More Accurately Than Chest CT Scan: A Retrospective Study in 36 Cases

Authors

  • Liwen Bao Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China
  • Jiechun Huang Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China
  • Fangrui Wang Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China
  • Liewen Pang Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China
  • Yiqing Wang Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China
  • Haiming Shi Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, 12th Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, PR, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1906

Abstract

Background: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is defined as impaired diastolic cardiac function caused by a calcified and thickened pericardium. We assessed the clinical characteristics and time to diagnosis, as well as patient prognosis
after pericardiectomy. 

Methods: We analyzed the records of 36 CP patients who underwent pericardiectomy at Huashan Hospital, China, between 2012 and 2015. Clinical manifestations, length of time to diagnosis, laboratory parameters, and diagnostic imaging results were examined. All patients underwent pericardiectomy, and were assessed post-operatively for quality of life and improvement of cardiac function using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). 

Results: All patients displayed shortness of breath and polyserous effusion, as well as elevated pro B-type natriuretic peptide and thickened pericardium. Mean time between onset of symptoms and a definitive diagnosis of CP was 9.5 ± 2.1 months. Pericardiectomy was performed within one week of diagnosis. Mean central venous pressure decreased from a pre-operative 19.92 ± 6.6 mmHg to a post-operative 8.5 ± 2.7 mmHg. Within 1.5 ± 0.7 years of surgery, all patients maintained good quality of life and cardiac function, which resulted in a mean score of 0.9 ± 0.6 on the MLHFQ. 

Conclusion: A definitive diagnosis of CP is usually made long after the onset of symptoms. Early detection and diagnosis by echocardiography with elevated central venous pressure and early treatment by surgery are key to an improved prognosis and resumption of good cardiac function.

References

Avgerinos D, Rabitnokov Y, Worku B, et al. 2014. Fifteen-year experience and outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Card Surg 29:434-8.

Chang SA. 2017. Tuberculous and Infectious Pericarditis. Cardiol Clin 35:615-622.

Chen H. 2014. Analysis of effects of different approaches of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. China Modern Medicine 21: 29-30.

Clare GC, Troughton RW. 2007. Management of constrictive pericarditis in the 21st century. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 9:436-442.

Jiang Y, Shao F. 2013. A stone miner with both silicosis and constrictive pericarditis: case report and review of the literature. BMC Pulm Med 13:71.

Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al. 2013. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:965-1012. e15.

Lee Y, Naruse Y, Tanaka K. 2018. Effectiveness and long-term outcomes of surgical intervention for constrictive epicardium in constrictive pericarditis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 66:137-44.

Lin Y, Zhou M, Xiao J, et al. 2012. Treating constrictive pericarditis in a Chinese single-center study: a five-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 94:1235-40.

Liu K, Deng YB, Sun J, et al. 2014. Evaluation of cardiac function in patients with constrictive pericarditis by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Acta Med Univ Sci Technol Huazhong 43: 90-93.

Liu K, Deng YB. 2013. Progresses of ultrasonic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Chin J Interv Ther 10:116-119.

Mookadam F, Jiamsripong P, Raslan SF, et al. 2011. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy in the modern era. Future Cardiol 7:471-83.

Motoki H, Alraies MC, Dahiya A, et al. 2013. Changes in left atrial mechanics following pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:640-8.

Schwefer M, Aschenbach R, Heidemann J, et al. 2009. Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:502-10.

Syed FF, Schaff HV, Oh JK. 2014. Constrictive pericarditis--a curable diastolic heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 11:530-44.

Szabó G, Schmack B, Bulut C, et al. 2013. Constrictive pericarditis: risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:1023-8.

Welch TD. 2017. Constrictive pericarditis: diagnosis, management and clinical outcomes. Heart 0:1-7.

Xiong QF, Ma XJ, Chen Y. 2013. Clinical value of MSCT in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Radiologic Practice 4:022.

Published

2018-05-24

How to Cite

Bao, L., Huang, J., Wang, F., Pang, L., Wang, Y., & Shi, H. (2018). Echocardiography with Elevated Central Venous Pressure Diagnosing Constrictive Pericarditis More Accurately Than Chest CT Scan: A Retrospective Study in 36 Cases. The Heart Surgery Forum, 21(3), E190-E193. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.1906

Issue

Section

Article