Sex difference among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in northern China

  • Yongxin Wang Department of Medicine, Cangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
  • Zhiqiang Yang Department of Medicine, Cangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
  • Yonggang Yuan Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
  • Zesheng Xu Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.

Abstract

Background: Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on gender-specific patients with ULMCA in the Chinese population and provide a basis for further treatment of PCI in ULMCA disease.

Methods: 173 patients (female, N = 52; male, N = 121; mean age = 61.02 ± 7.95) with ULMCA disease, who underwent PCI between January 2010 and December 2014, were investigated in our study. The mean follow-up time was
23.8 ± 7.3 months. The baseline clinical characteristics, coronary angiography (CAG) and PCI procedures, and in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of gender-specific patients were evaluated.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics with the exception of body weight, height, and smoking indexes between women and men. During PCI procedure, femoral artery puncture was more preferred in women than men (P < .05), whereas radial artery puncture was more preferred in men than women (P < .05). The characteristics of CAG and PCI procedures (except puncture path) were showed with no markedly difference between women and men. The incidences of MACCEs in male patients during the in-hospital and follow-up periods were slightly higher than those of the female patients although with no statistical differences.

Conclusion: In northern China, the incidence of ULMCA disease in men is likely to be higher than in women, whereas PCI for ULMCA disease shows similarly favorable outcomes in women as well as in men. During the PCI procedure, femoral artery puncture in women and radial artery puncture in men are recommended.

Author Biographies

Zhiqiang Yang, Department of Medicine, Cangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.

None

Yonggang Yuan, Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.

None

Zesheng Xu, Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.

None

References

Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, et al. 1995. Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience. Circulation 91:2335-44.

Fajadet J, Chieffo A. 2012. Current management of left main coronary artery disease. European heart journal 33:36-50b.

Proudfit WL, Shirey EK, Sones FM, Jr. 1967. Distribution of arterial lesions demonstrated by selective cinecoronary arteriography. Circulation 36:54-62.

Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F, et al. 2006. Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation 113:2542-7.

Ragosta M, Dee S, Sarembock IJ, et al. 2006. Prevalence of unfavorable angiographic characteristics for percutaneous intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 68:357-62.

Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. 2004. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 110:e340-437.

Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2013. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 82:E266-355.

Lee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F, et al. 2006. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47:864-70.

Herity NA, Lo S, Lee DP, et al. 2003. Effect of a change in gender on coronary arterial size: a longitudinal intravascular ultrasound study in transplanted hearts. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 41:1539-46.

Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, et al. 2007. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 49:1230-50.

Haynes MP, Sinha D, Russell KS, et al. 2000. Membrane estrogen receptor engagement activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase via the PI3-kinase-Akt pathway in human endothelial cells. Circulation research 87:677-82.

Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, et al. 2007. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. The New England journal of medicine 356:2591-602.

Yin Y, Xin X, Geng T, Xu Z. 2015. Clinical comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with domestic drug-eluting stents versus off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:14376-82.

Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. 2007. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344-51.

Soleimani A, Abbasi A, Kazzazi EH, et al. 2009. Prevalence of left main coronary artery disease among patients with ischemic heart disease: insights from the Tehran Angiography Registry. Minerva cardioangiologica 57:175-83.

Xuebin Wang LZ, Weiting Xu. 2014. The prognostic analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery dieases. Chinese Circulation Journal 29:74.

Sheiban I, La Spina C, Cavallero E, et al. 2010. Sex-related differences in patients undergoing percutaneous unprotected left main stenting. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 5:795-800.

Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. 2004. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 44:349-56.

Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, et al. 2004. Comparison of the radial and femoral approaches in left main PCI: a retrospective study. J Invasive Cardiol 16:129-32.

Kelsey SF, James M, Holubkov AL, et al. 1993. Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation 87:720-7.

Narins CR, Ling FS, Fischi M, et al. 2006. In-hospital mortality among women undergoing contemporary elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a reexamination of the gender gap. Clinical cardiology 29:254-8.

D'Ascenzo F, Gonella A, Quadri G, et al. 2011. Comparison of mortality rates in women versus men presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The American journal of cardiology 107:651-4.

Benamer H, Tafflet M, Bataille S, et al. 2011. Female gender is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality after STEMI in the era of primary PCI: insights from the greater Paris area PCI Registry. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 6:1073-9.

Singh M, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al. 2008. Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51:2313-20.

Jacobs AK, Johnston JM, Haviland A, et al. 2002. Improved outcomes for women undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39:1608-14.

Published
2018-07-26
Section
Articles